Cover of: Products liability and the food consumer | F. Reed Dickerson Read Online
Share

Products liability and the food consumer

  • 244 Want to read
  • ·
  • 69 Currently reading

Published by Greenwood Press in Wesport, Conn .
Written in English

Subjects:

Places:

  • United States.

Subjects:

  • Products liability -- Food -- United States.

Book details:

Edition Notes

Bibliography: p. 294-303.

Statementby Reed Dickerson.
Classifications
LC ClassificationsKF1297.F6 D5 1972
The Physical Object
Paginationxviii, 339 p.
Number of Pages339
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL4577084M
ISBN 100837157463
LC Control Number77139130

Download Products liability and the food consumer

PDF EPUB FB2 MOBI RTF

Additional Physical Format: Online version: Dickerson, F. Reed (Frederick Reed), Products liability and the food consumer. Boston: Little, Brown, No doubt, product liability in the food industry is a good thing. Companies that manufacture, packages, distribute and sell food products will be compelled to ensure that all quality standards are met during the phases of production, storage, and sale of food products. The plaintiffs' bar and associated health groups have put a spotlight on the food and beverage addition to product liability and consumer fraud claims, we’ve seen an increase in municipalities looking to curb the consumption of certain foods or beverages, media interest in obesity claims, the vilification of sugar and other food substances, concerns about genetically modified. Throughout the U.S., food supply businesses are held to a legal standard called "strict liability" when a consumer is injured because of ingesting a defective food product. A consumer does not have.

  Product liability is an area of the law that falls within the purview of tort, or injury, law. Although the requirements for finding a defendant liable for an injury under product liability law may vary throughout the world, the basic concept remains the same—protection for consumers from defective products. Food product liability is a subsection within the area of product liability. Product Liability Laws and Regulations ICLG - Product Liability covers common issues in product liability laws and regulations – including liability systems, product recall, causation, defences and estoppel, procedure, time limits, remedies, market-share liability and costs/funding – in 22 jurisdictions. Published: 28/05/ Product Liability law in India LIABILITY FOR MANUFACTURING OR DISTRIBUTING A DEFECTIVE PRODUCT IN INDIA. In India, Product liability law, also called “products liability”, governs the liability of manufacturers, wholesalers, distributors, and vendors for injury to a person or property caused by dangerous or defective products. damages. That, in short, is product liability; and, not surprisingly, the law that governs this kind of liability is referred to as product liability law. This article is intended to serve as a brief introduction to product liability law, especially as it relates to food. However, before we embark on our introductory tour of this subject, a few.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission reported that 4, people were killed in the United States in consumer-product-related incidences in , and millions of people visited hospital emergency rooms from consumer-product-related injuries. shopped with his wife at a Giant Food Store. This complex products liability case is before us. Food Product Liability in Canada 5. Product recalls routinely generate litigation. The very fact of a product recall is often a triggering event for subsequent consumer litigation. Indeed, this can occur even where the recall itself may not be attributable to the conduct of the product manufacturer or distributor. In . Products liability describes a type of claim, not a separate theory of liability. Products liability has strong emotional overtones—ranging from the prolitigation position of consumer advocates to the conservative perspective of the manufacturers. The book provides a history and overview of products liability from the perspective of someone that believes that negligence should be the only standard. It glosses over the impracticality of placing the entire burden on the consumer and advocates for essentially a liability free marketplace/5(4).